Should we formally vote on adding new groups?
Moderators: General Forum Moderators, Global Moderators
-
- Posts: 3411
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 12:46 am
- Location: SSX
Should the entire membership vote to let a group form for a game?
No signature
-
- Posts: 1454
- Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 10:44 pm
- Location: FL
The 5 minimum people rule has worked before. So long as there's interest in the game the group should be allowed to exist.
-
- Posts: 465
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 3:24 am
- Location: SSX Vault 12
It doesn't seem necessary, since we have a pretty standard metric to judge the formation of a group. I don't see why the SSX as a whole would want to deny players a game anyway.
-
- Posts: 3411
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 12:46 am
- Location: SSX
I was thinking it might be useful to avoid creating groups that vanish as soon as they form. Best way to know whether or not that will happen, is to ask
So I asked
So I asked
No signature
-
- Posts: 6114
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 5:57 pm
- Location: UK
I agree with Fut, so long as there are at least 5 peeps then it should go alright. Don't think we've had any probs doing it that way before have we?
I see where ur comin from tho Quiz...
I see where ur comin from tho Quiz...
"My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings:
Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair!"
Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare,
The lone and level sands stretch far away.
Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair!"
Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare,
The lone and level sands stretch far away.
-
- Posts: 363
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 5:49 pm
I dont think it's necessary. It's quite obvious whether a game has group potential or not -- if a lot of people play it, it's only natural to form one, but even if it isn't, the main forums are always there for it
-
- Posts: 1525
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 8:56 pm
- Location: USA
I don't think thats needed. The 5 person thing usually worked well before.
-
- Posts: 3411
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 12:46 am
- Location: SSX
Well, not everything worked that well before
Seems pretty unanimous so far, though.
I like having a sounding board for this stuff
Seems pretty unanimous so far, though.
I like having a sounding board for this stuff
No signature
-
- Posts: 465
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 3:24 am
- Location: SSX Vault 12
Yeah, some divisions came and went within a couple weeks, but I don't think the failure of the Red Faction division was what tore apart the SSC.
-
- Posts: 1525
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 8:56 pm
- Location: USA
There was a Red Faction division? Didn't even notice. Of course if it came and went before Nov. '02, I wasn't there yet.
-
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 2:18 am
- Location: England
Say 5 minimum is enough to start a group, with a vote if someone raises an 'objection'? I can't think of a better word for it, objection is a bit harsh, but basically say let it start unless someone believes it will die quickly or whatever, in which case a vote is held?
-
- Posts: 3067
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 3:22 am
- Location: Denial
I don't see the harm in it if it fails.
If it fails, it fails.
If it fails, it fails.
-
- Posts: 3411
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 12:46 am
- Location: SSX
Fair enough. This is hardly a critical issue. Like i said, it's good to have a sounding board.
No signature
-
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 10:58 pm
- Location: SSX CMU OMGWTFBBQ
Mmm, should we revise the 5 person rule?
-
- Posts: 3411
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 12:46 am
- Location: SSX
In what way?
Not sure we need to codify too much, but, toss out the idea big man.
Not sure we need to codify too much, but, toss out the idea big man.
No signature
-
- Posts: 3067
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 3:22 am
- Location: Denial
I'd put it as
5 people
3 weeks (that's the new part)
Active threads in General. (so is this one)
You need to need a new forum in order for one to be created. Just my opinion.
5 people
3 weeks (that's the new part)
Active threads in General. (so is this one)
You need to need a new forum in order for one to be created. Just my opinion.
-
- Posts: 1713
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 11:15 pm
- Location: Next Door
Not much to say here that hasnt already been said
-
- Posts: 3411
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 12:46 am
- Location: SSX
Looks like a no.
No signature